Key Takeaways
- HBO’s documentary explores Peter Todd as a possible Satoshi Nakamoto.
- Crypto members defend Todd in opposition to HBO’s speculative claims.
Share this text
HBO’s extremely anticipated documentary, “Cash Electrical: The Bitcoin Thriller,” ended up pointing to Peter Todd as a possible candidate for the identification of Satoshi Nakamoto, the mysterious creator of Bitcoin. Who’s Peter Todd and why does HBO suppose he’s Satoshi?
Unmasking Peter Todd: Who’s he?
Peter Todd, born and raised in Canada, is a recognized Bitcoin core developer and cryptographer who has gained recognition for his contributions to the Bitcoin ecosystem.
As one of many earliest contributors to the Bitcoin codebase, Todd is amongst a couple of people who communicated straight with Satoshi earlier than their disappearance in 2011. He beforehand confirmed that he was in his early teenagers when he began communication with Hal Finney and Adam Again, two outstanding Bitcoin pioneers.
The developer has labored on a handful of blockchain initiatives, finest often called a Bitcoin Core Developer at Coinkite since 2014. He has held outstanding roles in a number of initiatives, together with serving as Chief Scientist at Mastercoin and Darkish Pockets.
Todd can also be the founding father of OpenTimestamps, a venture geared toward offering a decentralized timestamping service. He participated within the Zcash trusted setup ceremony in 2016, although he later criticized the method.
Why does HBO determine Peter as Satoshi?
Neither Len Sassaman nor Nick Szabo had been named Satoshi in HBO’s launched documentary. Quite, the highlight shone on Peter Todd, an unsuspected particular person till a leak simply hours earlier than the movie’s launch.
To assist its claims, HBO pointed to a mistaken reply in 2010 when Todd unintentionally responded to a publish that Satoshi Nakamoto had began on the Bitcointalk discussion board utilizing his personal account. Nevertheless, this commentary was shortly seen as circumstantial, missing the concrete proof wanted to hyperlink Todd to Satoshi.
Many crypto group members have clarified that Todd was merely correcting or clarifying Satoshi’s publish, not impersonating him.
“Imagine it or not, this was their most compelling argument, and it’s not compelling in any respect. It doesn’t look to me like Peter is continuous Satoshi’s ideas, it simply appears like he’s correcting Satoshi, as Peter has executed many occasions,” Pledditor, an X person acknowledged.
HBO’s documentary additionally introduced up the truth that Todd applied the “replace-by-fee” idea, which was mentioned in the identical thread on Bitcointalk. It was claimed that he used the pseudonym “John Dillon” to advertise the idea and that this pseudonym was linked to Satoshi.
As well as, the movie steered that each Satoshi and Todd used British/Canadian spellings of their on-line communications, which made it a chunk of proof about their connection. Furthermore, it added that Todd’s schedule matched Satoshi’s posting schedule on Bitcointalk.
The present additional used Todd’s previous dialogue of “sacrificing” Bitcoin as proof that he is likely to be Satoshi, decoding it because the “destruction” of the coin.
“Once more, this isn’t proof of something. Simply extra weak innuendo and circumstance,” Pledditor added.
Although Todd has repeatedly denied being Satoshi, he has confronted mounting hypothesis surrounding his identification. The developer certainly claimed forward of and after the discharge that he was not Satoshi.
Backlash and jokes
The speculation of Cullen Hoback, primarily based on previous chat logs and a 2010 BitcoinTalk publish, has sparked criticism and sarcastic feedback from members of the crypto group. Distinguished figures and organizations have rallied to Todd’s protection, criticizing the documentary’s speculative nature and the hazards it poses to Todd’s security.
Cobra, administrator of BitcoinTalk, and Adam Cochran of Cinneamhain Ventures, denounced the irresponsible journalism displayed within the documentary.
Piece of shit journalist is placing folks in actual bodily hazard. I’m sorry you or Adam must take care of this nonsense. Keep secure.
— Cøbra (@CobraBitcoin) October 8, 2024
What a bust.
Wild hypothesis, lacks understanding of the tech that guidelines it out, no smoking gun.
And irresponsibly names somebody as Satoshi, who’s alive in the present day, says they aren’t Satoshi, and does so with out strong proof.
The documentary even will get the dates of Todd’s… https://t.co/chLUjIo7fh pic.twitter.com/Ct7mbrjP8G
— Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) October 9, 2024
Few know this however I as soon as shared a room with @peterktodd. Whereas he was sleeping I heard him gurgle “It needs to be Craig”. What does it imply? https://t.co/rfuzTpwH9s
— Jesse Powell (@jespow) October 9, 2024
Polymarket bettors had been proper
Polymarket bettors precisely predicted that Satoshi Nakamoto was somebody not listed within the ballot.
Within the days main as much as the documentary’s launch, merchants initially favored Len Sassaman, with odds reaching 49%. Nevertheless, because the present approached, bets shifted in the direction of Nick Szabo. In the end, the vast majority of bettors had been assured that Satoshi was somebody who had not beforehand been thought of.
Share this text